Consumer culture is ubiquitous; it has no certain historical origins and no clear social boundaries.
- Hammer and Axe (Dragonlance: Dwarven Nations, Book 2);
- Down the Great Unknown: John Wesley Powells 1869 Journey of Discovery and Tragedy Through the Grand Canyon.
- Feedback in Analog Circuits?
- mODa 10 – Advances in Model-Oriented Design and Analysis: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop in Model-Oriented Design and Analysis Held in Łagów Lubuski, Poland, June 10–14, 2013!
- VTLS Chameleon iPortal نتائج البحث.
In the United States, where consumer society was ostensibly invented as a way to wage the cold war, shopping is the number two leisure activity after watching television. Young Japanese women who arrive in the United States as exchange students list shopping as their number one hobby. Is shopping women's work or a form of leisure activity for the whole family? Is it true that women buy things and men buy services?
How does commodification produce tastes that are race and class inflected? In what ways does globalization reorganize under-and overconsumption in terms of the nation state? Commodities are characterized by their dual nature: material composition and symbolic meaning. They have been shaped by processes of production, but they are also remade in their removal from the marketplace and their integration into everyday life. Consumers are not just deceived into wanting what they don't need, they learn to satisfy needs by refashioning available products.
How consumers understand their needs and wants is not just the outcome of manipulation by the market-. Making sense of the symbolic and social uses of selling, desiring, acquiring, possessing, and losing things and services relies on "prior meanings," already established in a particular culture. All four texts under review rely on the uses of history, on making consumer practices historically intelligible. Timothy Burke, in Lifebuoy Men, Lux Women: Commodification, Consumption, and Cleanliness in Modern Zimbabwe, examines goods used on the body in both colonial and postcolonial Zimbabwe to create a social history of consumption in Africa, Laura C.
Nelson examines material culture in South Korea between the s and the s-from "economic miracle" to government-sponsored "frugality"-as a way of understanding formations of national identity in Measured Excess: Status, Gender, and Consumer Nationalism in South Korea. Two texts make claims as firsts: the first social history of consumption in Africa Burke and the first ethnography to discuss nationalism in terms of consumption Nelson.
Two are about the developing world, Zimbabwe and South Korea, and two focus on particular urban neighborhoods: London's West End and the Kangnam district of Seoul. Women have never been absent from studies about consumer practices. On the contrary, the separation of production from consumption has positioned women as the primary consumers. The protagonist of the most frequently told story of consumption has been the bourgeois housewife, she who consumes not as an individual, but as a family member.
The housewife represents not the consumer, but the image of consumer decision-making, in her contradictory roles as buyer, worker, or unemployed. Daniel Miller, in his polemical introduction to Acknowledging Consumption: A Review ofNew Studies describes the dual interest of the housewife:. Her success is evident in that she has overtrumped capitalism to replace the capitalist as the main instrument for extracting value to the benefit of her household.
But, in addition, she has to negate dialectically this sense of value as abstracted labour at the same moment that she obtains it, by transmuting it as far as possible into "value" in the colloquial sense of that term.
She has to create through consumption the moral and affective qualities that sustain and reproduce social relations using a variety of social mechanisms. This may involve either the appropriation of the meaning given to goods by producers or the creative construction of her social relations through consumption processes. Although she does not feel it, the housewife has enormous power that both provokes anxiety she may forget to replace the toilet paper and be the source of blame and is central to the construction of desire she may instill a wish to travel by making known the pleasure of kiwis.
If the shift in understanding capitalist formations from production to consumption has replaced the proletariat with the housewife, the shift from Karl Marx to Michel Foucault as the source of a theory of power has marked the formation of cultural studies. In the process, the housewife as theoretical subject has been displaced to draw attention to a multiplicity of consumer practices.
They are admonished to regularly ask themselves, "why do I buy this? This question nevertheless presupposes that an individual can make sense of needs, as opposed to needs being manufactured by the culture into aform of"common sense. As consumers shop not just for goods but also for identities, capitalism continues to rethink how it produces goods. In the recent shift from production-led to demand-led capitalism, as identified by Daniel Miller, goods are no longer produced in order to persuade people to purchase them, but the scale and speed of retailing is constantly changing in response to consumer taste.
Consumers can choose to sign up for "loyalty cards" that reduce the price on purchases and also provide the stores with instant information about what people are buying to let producers know what new products to make available. Demand-led capitalism makes capitalism more profitable, and although mass consumption promises to overcome class-and race-based differences produced by political inequalities, it perpetuates those differences by the goods that people possess: "The majority of First World consumers have been almost entirely relieved of seasonality, of distance once they possess a car and of scarcity.
How central are women to this new, demand-led capitalism?
By shifting the focus from needs to wants, from economic theories to the "politics of pleasure," from women looking at goods and men looking at women to the purchasing of gendered "identities," cultural studies insists on making gender, rather than women, central to the drama of consumerism. In the four texts under discussion, however, the paradigmatic consumer is still assumed to be a woman, even as the category woman is interpreted differently in each text.
Bowlby argues that the shopper is now no longer a woman but neither has she become a man ; Rappaport positions the Victorian shopper as a woman walking alone, learning to navigate the city by looking at department store windows and shop girls in musical comedies as equally instructive in terms of what to buy; Burke includes women's organizations in his histories and women in his interviews, even as toiletries are somewhat overdetermined as gendered commodities and gender as a category of analysis remains largely absent from the political theories he invokes; Nelson examines women in South Korea, perhaps at the expense of men, inasmuch as foreign goods but not the sexual services of foreign women are targeted by the government's critique of "excessiveconsumption.
Carried away : the invention of modern shopping / Rachel Bowlby.
However, in spite of their engagement with the methods of cultural studies, and the admonition within feminist studies to pay attention to gender as a category of analysis, these texts fail to shed much light on male consumers. They fail to explain why, according to the claim of a Third Wave feminist, the only real difference left between women and men is that women shop and men don't. For middle-class women, once there are places to rest, going shopping in Victorian London is pure pleasure-the pleasure of things to see.
Why, though, is shopping not pleasurable for men? Doing the shopping for food as well as for clothes, the fate of men as well as of women, has become a chore in postmodern culture, even as women continue to claim shopping as a hobby.
Women are consuming goods and services for their families in Seoul, but are all women housewives, and are they ever being served in ways similar to or different from men? The exception seems to be Zimbabwe, where the manner of selling soaps to men becomes of greater interest than the manner of selling them to women because domestic hygiene, physical cleanliness, and beauty are always already feminine, and the housewife, as we know her, belongs to an indigenous elite rather than the bourgeoisie. Going versus Doing the Shopping Rachel Bowlby in Carried Away and Erika Diane Rappaport in Shopping for Pleasure are both interested in shopping as a form of looking without necessarily buying, characterized by the increasing mobility of the consumer and the growing size of the store.
Bowlby begins by comparing the department store with the supermarket: one sells clothes, the other food; one invites you in, the other won't let you out. If the former is about attracting attention through visual display, the latter completely dispenses with aesthetics in favor of "piling it high and selling it cheap. Finally, it is about the checkout, where the open-ended pleasure of aimless movement and the freedom to fondle commodities is brought to a halt, not because it is now time to pay, but because you might not be able to pay.
London: Sage, pp. Gregson, N. Guy, A. Hochschild, A. London: University of California Press. Hopwood, C. Jackson, P. Lupton, D. London: Sage. Machleit, K. March, C. Miller, D. New York: Cornell University Press. Moss, P. Negrin, L. Oatley, K. Oxford: Blackwell. Tomm, W. Enlarge cover. Error rating book.
Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Preview — Carried Away by Rachel Bowlby. Asserting that a history of shopping was, until recently, a history of women, Rachel Bowlby trains her eye on the evolution of the modern shopper. She uses a compelling blend of history, literary analysis, and cultural criticism to explore the rise of department stores and supermarkets of the United States, France, and Great Britain. Bowlby recalls the fascinating early day Asserting that a history of shopping was, until recently, a history of women, Rachel Bowlby trains her eye on the evolution of the modern shopper.
Bowlby recalls the fascinating early days of these institutions. In the mid-nineteenth century, when department stores first developed, their fabulous new buildings brought middle-class women into town, where they could indulge in what was then a new activity: a day's shopping. The stores offered luxury, flattering women into believing that they belonged in a beautiful environment.
It is here, Bowlby argues, that the idea of the modern woman's passion for fashion and shopping took hold. Developed in the twentieth century, supermarkets took an opposite tack: they offered functionality, standardization, and cheapness.hukusyuu-mobile.com/wp-content/facebook/955-locate-a.php
online shopping – David Lawrence
However, Bowlby claims, despite their differences, the two institutions belong together as emblematic of their respective eras' social developments: the department store with the growth of cities, the supermarket with the proliferation of suburbs. With their dazzling lights and displays, both supermarkets and department stores were thought to produce in females an enhanced or trance-like state of mind.
For readers who regard shopping as a spectator or participatory sport, and for those who wish to understand our culture and the psychology of women, or those who simply enjoy a witty, literate romp through the aisles, Carried Away is the perfect purchase. Get A Copy. Hardcover , pages. More Details